Back to List
Industry NewsAISecurityOpen Source

OpenClaw Security Risks Soar: Thousands of Corporate Deployments Expose Critical Vulnerabilities and Sensitive Data, Raising Alarm for Security Leaders

OpenClaw, an open-source AI agent, has seen a rapid surge in deployments, escalating from 1,000 to over 21,000 publicly exposed instances in less than a week. This widespread adoption includes corporate environments, where employees are installing OpenClaw on company machines, granting autonomous agents extensive privileges like shell access, file system access, and OAuth tokens for services such as Slack, Gmail, and SharePoint. Critical vulnerabilities have been identified, including CVE-2026-25253, a CVSS 8.8 remote code execution flaw, and CVE-2026-25157, a command injection vulnerability. A security analysis of ClawHub marketplace skills revealed that 7.1% contain critical security flaws exposing plaintext credentials, with a Bitdefender audit finding 17% of skills exhibited malicious behavior. Furthermore, Moltbook, an AI agent social network built on OpenClaw, exposed 1.5 million API authentication tokens, 35,000 email addresses, and private messages with plaintext OpenAI API keys due to a misconfigured Supabase database. This rapid proliferation and inherent security risks present a significant challenge for security leaders seeking controlled evaluation paths.

VentureBeat

The open-source AI agent, OpenClaw, is experiencing a rapid and concerning increase in adoption, with Censys tracking its publicly exposed deployments from approximately 1,000 to over 21,000 in under a week. This surge is particularly alarming within business environments, as confirmed by Bitdefender’s GravityZone telemetry. Employees are deploying OpenClaw on corporate machines using simple install commands, inadvertently granting these autonomous agents significant privileges, including shell access, file system access, and OAuth tokens for critical corporate applications like Slack, Gmail, and SharePoint.

Several critical security vulnerabilities have been identified within OpenClaw and its ecosystem. CVE-2026-25253, a one-click remote code execution flaw rated CVSS 8.8, allows attackers to steal authentication tokens via a single malicious link, potentially leading to full gateway compromise in milliseconds. Another vulnerability, CVE-2026-25157, is a command injection flaw that permits arbitrary command execution through the macOS SSH handler. A comprehensive security analysis of 3,984 skills available on the ClawHub marketplace revealed that 283, or approximately 7.1% of the entire registry, contain critical security flaws that expose sensitive credentials in plaintext. A separate audit conducted by Bitdefender further indicated that roughly 17% of the skills analyzed exhibited outright malicious behavior.

The exposure of credentials extends beyond OpenClaw itself. Researchers at Wiz discovered that Moltbook, an AI agent social network built upon OpenClaw infrastructure, had its entire Supabase database publicly accessible without Row Level Security enabled. This significant breach exposed 1.5 million API authentication tokens, 35,000 email addresses, and private messages exchanged between agents, which contained plaintext OpenAI API keys. A single misconfiguration granted anyone with a web browser full read and write access to every agent credential on the platform.

The rapid proliferation of such AI agents is undeniable, with OpenAI’s Codex app achieving 1 million downloads in its first week. Meta has also been observed testing OpenClaw integration within its AI platform codebase. This rapid adoption, coupled with the severe security vulnerabilities and widespread credential exposure, presents a dilemma for security leaders. While setup guides suggest acquiring hardware like a Mac Mini for evaluation, security advisories caution against interacting with these agents, leaving security professionals without a controlled pathway for secure evaluation.

Related News

Industry News

Hacker News Discussion: 'Be Wary of Bluesky' - An Overview of User Comments and Concerns

This news item, sourced from Hacker News and published on February 20, 2026, under the title 'Be Wary of Bluesky,' consists solely of user comments. As the original content provided is 'Comments,' the summary reflects that the article is a compilation or discussion thread where users express their views, concerns, or experiences regarding Bluesky. Without the actual content of these comments, a detailed summary of specific points cannot be generated, but it indicates an active community discussion around the topic.

Industry News

US Citizens Reportedly Dismantling and Destroying Flock Surveillance Cameras Nationwide

Reports indicate a growing trend across the United States where individuals are actively dismantling and destroying Flock surveillance cameras. This activity suggests public resistance or concern regarding the deployment and use of these surveillance technologies. The original news content, published on February 20, 2026, from Hacker News, primarily consists of 'Comments,' implying that the core information is derived from public discourse or observations rather than a detailed journalistic report. The precise motivations behind these actions and the scale of the incidents are not detailed in the provided source material, which only mentions the activity and its widespread nature.

Industry News

A16Z Partner Challenges 'Vibe Code Everything' Theory: A Critical Look at Future Development Paradigms

An A16Z partner has publicly stated that the theory suggesting a future where 'we'll vibe code everything' is 'wrong.' This brief statement, originating from Hacker News, indicates a divergence of opinion within the tech investment community regarding the future direction and methodology of software development. The comment, currently without further elaboration in the provided source, suggests a potential debate or skepticism concerning highly intuitive or abstract coding approaches, possibly in contrast to more structured or traditional methods. The lack of additional context leaves the specific reasons for this disagreement open to interpretation, but highlights a significant viewpoint from a prominent venture capital firm.